DYX403 Dyslexia Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title DYX403: Dyslexia Assessment Reflection: Person first approach and inclusive practices for dyslexia and learning differences. Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes a) Identify and describe educational experiences associated with dyslexia and associated learning differences. c) Analyse historical and contemporary challenges and practices for supporting individuals with dyslexic learning differences, and their family/carers. e) Identify and describe the range of additional supports an individual with dyslexic learning differences, and their carer, needs in education. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2 (week 4) Weighting 30 % Total Marks 100 marks Context: The purpose of this activity is to begin, through the process of understanding and reflecting on the lived experience of individuals, and, on what has been studied so far about dyslexia. To achieve this the person first approach is introduced. The first step of this approach is to have empathy with the individual with dyslexia, to see the world through their eyes, and to understand how dyslexia has impacted on his or her life and learning. Too often we miss the perspective of the person with the lived experience. The person first approach helps us develop the desired skills to appreciate the perspective of the other and to empathize. Empathy is a difficult step that takes time to practice, but throughout this module, we will be practicing the process to develop, through reflection, the perspective of the lived experience. Reflection is related to self and improving future practice through a retrospective analysis of action, and seeks to improve professional practice, through an understanding of the relative successes and failures of previous events. DYX403 Assessment 1.Docx Page 2 of 8 Instructions: This assessment task requires you to write a 1500 word report, using both empathy and reflection approaches. This report provides an opportunity for you to acknowledge person first methods, and documenting personal reflections. Guiding statements that may help to facilitate the person first approach ? From your perspective, discuss how each story reaffirms and/or challenges your own views about dyslexia. ? Describe if the stories told in the video relate to your own bias, prejudice or assumptions relating to dyslexia. ? By putting yourself in the place of any one of the individuals, discuss the challenges s/he faced in different environments. This can be school, career pathways or personal circumstances ? Discuss how the reported lived experience contributes to the debate about meeting diverse learning needs of the student with dyslexia Guiding Questions that may help to facilitate your reflection ? Consider your own practices and current involvement within education systems (e.g. teacher, support teacher, parent, allied professional such as psychologist). ? Explore potential changes to your views, and reflect on your acquired new knowledge about dyslexia ? Reflect on the value of a definition of dyslexia say what purpose you think it might serve. ? Consider how dyslexia might fit into policy and practice for effective teaching and learning ? How do you judge your ability to reflect on this topic after two modules? Format/Structure Your report should be written in first person. In this activity, you will begin with the video ‘Reflections of Dyslexia’. You should allow 30 minutes to view, listen and make notes about the educational and life events that each of the adults had experienced. Use your notes to plan the format and structure of your report. Cite your sources appropriately using APA6 style. Submission Instructions: Submit your assignment via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in DYX 403 Dyslexia. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the grade centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. DYX403 Assessment 1.Docx Page 3 of 8 Assessment criteria: ? Evidence of person first approach skill, to empathize with another person ? Evidence relating to reflective practice ? Use of documentary evidence ? Required components See rubric (below) for more detail on grading parameters.
Experts Tutors
We hire only masters and PhD assignment help tutors. Our tutors go through a rigorous evaluation process before they are being hired. This ensures that we deliver the best academic assistance services to our students.
24*7 Service
Our services for students are available 24x7 i.e. we are available online all the time 7 days in a week to help you in solving their academic projects in the best possible manner.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
ECON6000 Economic Principles Assessment 2A
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title ECON6000/ECON6002 Economic Principles and Decision Making Assessment Module 1 and 2 - Assessment 2: Short written assessment Individual/Group Individual Length 1000 words Learning Outcomes 1. Interpret and successfully apply economic concepts of supply and demand for effective organisational problem solving. 2. Apply quantitative and qualitative reasoning to business variables including demand, supply, production and costs. Calculation of costs for a better understanding of concepts surrounding the theory of firm. Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Sunday at the end of every Module Weighting 10% for each module Total Marks 10 marks for Module 1 and 10 marks for Module 2 Context: The short written module assessment allows you to apply your knowledge on the concepts and ideas discussed during the Module. This assessment will prepare you for the final report. Modules 1 and 2 - Assessment 2 Page 2 of 5 Instructions: Provide written answers to the following 2 problems. Discuss and explain sufficiently. Submit these answers in the Blackboard. You will complete the answers at the each of each module; You may submit the answers for both the modules together as a single word document. Module 1: (Each question is worth 5 marks; answer both the questions) 1) For an individual who earns $250 per week, cheaper food options could be noodles. However, suppose the same individual gets a better employment and his income increases, will the demand for noodles still be the same; explain the relevant concepts with appropriate diagram(s). 2) What is Production Possibility frontier (PPF) ?; what are the concepts that are covered by PPF?; use the table below to represent PPF diagrammatically and explain your diagram. Module 2: (each question is worth 5 marks; answer both the questions) 1) Given the Total Revenue (TR) for a certain firm is A$150,000, calculate Accounting profit and economic profit by stating the formula for both the calculations. Is the firm is financially sound? Substantiate your answer Choice Roadsters per day Convertibles per day A 800 0 B 600 400 C 400 500 D 200 575 E 0 600 Expenses Explicit cost (in A$) Implicit cost (in A$) Raw Materials 20,000 Wages 50,000 Rent 10,000 Electricity 5000 Interest on machinery 25,000 Foregone Pay 50,000 Foregone Interest 5,000 Foregone Rent 25,000 Modules 1 and 2 - Assessment 2 Page 3 of 5 2) The Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) here in New South Wales insists that vehicles which are over 7 years old should be taken for an inspection before renewal of registration for the next year. This is mainly to ensure the vehicle is road worthy. Analyze the type of externality behind this example using relevant diagrams to support your argument. (This space is left blank intentionally)
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
ECON6000 Economic Principles Assessment 2B
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title ECON6000/ECON6002 Economic Principles and Decision Making Assessment Module 3 and 4 - Assessment 2: Short written assessment Individual/Group Individual Length 1000 words Learning outcomes 1. Display understanding of the concepts covered in class in Modules 3 and 4 2. Ability to apply the concepts covered in class to the Australian economy and analyse the applicability of such concepts.to real time economic situations Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Sunday at the end of Module 4 Weighting Each module is worth 10 % Total Marks 10 marks for Module 3 and 10 marks for Module 4 Context: The short written module assessment allows you to apply your knowledge on the concepts and ideas discussed during the Module. Instructions: Answer the following at the end of their respective modules;You may submit your answers at the end of Module 4. Your submission could be a single word document upload. Module 3: (This question is worth 10 marks) 1) What is First Home Owners Grant (FHOG)? Using an appropriate diagram, explain who benefits from FHOG- is it buyer or seller? Module 4: (this is worth 10 marks) 1) Australian economy is currently facing an unemployment rate of approximately 5.2% according to recent statistics; as an emerging policy maker, what are the ways you would suggest to bring down unemployment to around 4.5%
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
ECON6000 Economic Principles Assessment 3
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title ECON6000/ECON6002 Economic Principles & Decision Making Assessment Assessment 3: Report Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 3000 words Learning outcomes 1. Successfully prepare a report after a careful research and analysis of the economic situation presented. Use of relevant macroeconomic concepts, statistical information will be handy to explain your findings. Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Sunday at the end of Module 6 Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks Context: This assessment allows you to apply your knowledge on the concepts and ideas discussed in all the modules during the course of study of this unit. This assignment is to mainly help you in your research and analysis and present a quality report based on you findings Instructions Based on the information provided, you are expected to research and analyse the current economic situation here in Australia. You are expected to make use of academic references only. Do not include information from blogs. The word limit does not include references, appendices, diagrams, tables and any other information provided to support your report. Your task Australia’s cash rate has been further reduced to 1%. The governor of Reserve Bank of Australia Dr. Phillip Lowe, has requested the Treasurer to initiate fiscal policy measures to go hand in hand with the expansionary monetary policy in order to revive the Australian economy. Dr. Lowe aims to improve inflation to between 2%-3% and also wants to reduce unemployment to 4.5%. Do you agree? Will monetary and fiscal policy measures alone be sufficient to revive the slowing Australian economy? Do you have any other suggestions to offer in addition to the policy measures mentioned? Please elaborate as a recommendation. Your report must be 3000 words long and should be addressed to the Governor of Reserve Bank of Australia. You are meant to use all the relevant economic concepts that you may have covered in class and that you have researched to support your answer.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
FINA600 Financial Management
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title FINA600 Financial Management Assessment Case Study Report Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 3000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: a) Apply the key theories and principles of financial management within varying contexts. b) Critically evaluate the role and content of each of the four main financial statements as sources of quantitative data, and their impact on business decision making. c) Investigate and evaluate the range of issues involved in the different types of funding. d) Understand and evaluate budgets and their impact on long and short-term business decisions. e) Critically analyse financial statements using effective strategies and apply accountancy information for informed managerial decision-making. Submission By 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of week 11 (Module 6) Weighting 50% Total Marks 50 marks Context The purpose of the assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to apply the knowledge and skills acquired in FINA600 Financial Management, to a practical task, involving the use of ‘real?world’ accounting information. This is intended to consolidate your accounting knowledge and skills. Instructions The basic requirement is to undertake a general financial analysis, comparing financial position and performance over the two most recent financial years, of an ASX listed company. The annual report for the chosen company should be available on the company website. FIN600_Assessment 2_Case Study Report Page 2 of 9 Note: You are to use the ‘consolidated’ data in conducting your analysis. The analysis should consider each of the following financial ratios: - profitability and market performance - efficiency, - liquidity, - capital structure Note: You are only required to look at the most recent financial report. For those ratios which involve averages, you will calculate an average for the most recent year only, the prior year ratio calculation will NOT consider average calculations. This assignment will contain two elements: 1. Schedule(s) of relevant ratios and other useful calculations - The detailed calculation of relevant ratios and other useful calculations should be included, as one appendix, prepared using Excel. An example template is provided under the assessment 2 information, FINA6017 appendix layout - Blank.xls. - You will be advised by your facilitator as to which ratios to calculate. - You are advised to show the formulae used in determining particular ratios and other figures. 2. A written report The written report is the main element of this assessment. A sample template is provided under the assessment 2 information, FINA6017 Assignment Suggested Layout - Blank.doc. The written report should: - Explain what is revealed by the ratios and other calculations, in the context of the company’s profitability, asset efficiency, liquidity, capital structure, and market performance. - In particular, any important changes over the two financial years should be identified, discussed and, where possible, explained. - Provide an overall assessment of whether the company, over the recent financial year, has been better than the previous financial year, in the perspective of existing equity investors (shareholders). In preparing this report, you should: - analyse the financial statements of the business; - identify key ratios and apply ratio analysis; - argue the case of why the organisation may or may not succeed in the future and what the business should be doing to help it succeed; - consider the impact of the political and competitive environment on the business; FIN600_Assessment 2_Case Study Report Page 3 of 9 - discuss relevant ethical considerations when an organisation becomes insolvent; - include external factors that need to be taken into consideration and the likelihood of a merger or acquisition; - provide a recommendation, that is, would you invest in this company after your own analysis or under what circumstances would you buy/save the business? The assignment is to comply with the University’s General Guide for the Presentation of Academic Work. Please see more information here: https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498849_1 Points to consider I. You are encouraged to seek and use additional public information about the company from sources, other than the annual report (for example, the internet, journal articles, newspapers, and business magazines). II. However, it is NOT envisaged that you will be engaged in extensive research of this nature and it is expected that the annual report will be the primary resource relied upon, in completing the assignment. III. You are asked NOT to try and make direct personal contact with the company or its officers (for example by telephone, fax, letter or email), in an attempt to gather further information. IV. It is important to note that you must NOT reproduce company promotional material from the annual report or company website and represent it as critical analysis. V. You will be provided relevant share price data by your facilitator for the company so that investment ratios (such as a price earnings ratio) can be calculated. VI. You may find it useful to consult accounting references, in addition to the prescribed text, which deals with the analysis and interpretation of company financial reports. VII. It is essential that you use the appropriate APA 6th referencing style, for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing As this is a Masters-level subject, students are expected to engage with high quality academic journal articles, using the Torrens University Library: http://library.laureate.net.au. Textbooks, Wikipedia and, in general
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
LAW6000 Business and Corporate Law Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title LAW 6000 – Business and Corporate Law Assessment Case Studies Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes 1. Explain the historical foundations of the Australian legal system and the current sources of law. 2. Describe the essential elements required to create, manage and discharge a contract and the remedies available for breach of contract. 3. Explain the different ways in which a business may be carried and the advantages and disadvantages of each method. 4. Identify the reasons for choosing one business structure over another. 5. Explain the processes for incorporating, managing and winding up a company. Submission End of module 5 11:55pm Sunday on the due date at the end of Module and Context: This assessment allows students to solve practical problems that arise from a fact scenario and to give appropriate advice to clients. Instructions: There are three case studies that you are required to critically analyse. With respect to each case study: ? Identify the legal issue(s) arising from the facts of the case study ? Identify the appropriate legal principles that requires discussion in the case study ? Apply the law to the facts of the case study ? Reach a conclusion/ give practical advice to your client. Your analysis should refer to appropriate cases and statutes and be referenced using the Harvard Reference system. You will be assessed in accordance with the Assessment Rubric. Case Study 1 Lance purchases a new ute from Mighty Motors Pty Ltd for $25,000. He tells Lynton, the car salesperson that he is a partner in a herbal products business. Lynton is aware of the business as he has read an article about it in the local newspaper. The three partners had agreed that a car would be purchased for the business but Lance was instructed not to spend over $20,000. Lynton is completely unaware that Lance has a purchasing limit. Will the partnership be bound by this contract? Can the other partners take action against Lance? Study 2 Xiaojing is keen to sell her products. The business produces a lavender and Echinacea moisturiser. The business produces an advertising flyer that states the moisturiser will ‘slow the effects of ageing’. This is false. The partnership is not happy with the Ute – they think they have bought a ‘lemon’. They decide to sell the car to Saqlaim a refugee from Syria who has little understanding of English. Fast talking and charismatic Lance talks him into purchasing the car. He enters a contract with a finance company to purchase the car. Will Saqlaim be bound by the contract? Do consumers have a remedy regarding the claims re the moisturiser? Case Study 3 Felix a uni student aged 20 is keen to earn some income during the summer holidays. He is employed as a casual to pick lavender. He will be paid $25 cash per bag. One Sunday Xiaojing tells him that he is doing such great work she will pay him an extral $100 for work he did yesterday clearing garden beds. She reneges on her promise and Felix is outraged. He wants to know if he can sue Xiaozing for the $100. Advise Felix.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
LAW6000 Business and Corporate Law Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name LAW6000 Business and Corporate Law Assessment Assessment 2 Case study Individual/Group Individual Length 2000 words +/- 10% Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: b) Demonstrate a sound comprehension of the essential elements required to create, manage and discharge a contract and assess the remedies available for breach of a contract; c) Examine legal principles related to creation and operation of various forms of business organisations and critically evaluate their effectiveness across a range of business scenarios. d) Explain the processes for incorporating, managing and winding up of a company, including key director duties, the importance of the Corporations Act 2001 and the role of regulatory bodies. e) Evaluate the role of agency in contract formation for different business vehicles and identify the associated risks such as vicarious liability for negligent acts. f) Employ legal skills (statute law and case law), critical reasoning and make informed judgements as to likely legal outcomes of a range of business scenarios. By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 10 (Module 5.2) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Context: This assessment allows students to solve practical problems that arise from a fact scenario and to give appropriate advice to clients. LAW6000_Assessment 2_Case Study Page 2 of 9 Instructions: There are five case studies you are required to critically analyse. With respect to each case study: ? Identify the legal issue(s) arising from the facts of the case study ? Identify the appropriate legal rules that requires discussion in the case study ? Apply the law to the facts of the case study ? Reach a conclusion/ give practical advice to your client. Your analysis should refer to appropriate cases and statutes and be referenced using the APA Reference system. You will be assessed in accordance with the Assessment Rubric. Submission Instructions: ? Submission is through Turnitin by 11.55 AEST Sunday of Week 10 of the relevant trimester LAW6000_Assessment 2_Case Study Page 3 of 9 Question 1 ( 20 marks) Matilda opened an accounting business and contracted with Quick Computers Ltd to supply her with the latest computer system by no later than April in the year. Quick Computers Ltd was two months late in delivering and installing the system. As a result, Matilda lost $25,000 in ordinary revenue. However, she also lost a lucrative contract to do a one-off urgent auditing job for a busy new client. Matilda bought the computer system expecting that it would be available to help with these contracts. Required With reference to relevant legal principles use the IRAC legal problem-solving approach to advise Matilda as to the damages that she may recover. Please explain fully, using relevant legal authority. (20 marks) Question 2 ( 20 marks) Albert runs a business which has a turnover of more than $1m. It is profitable and definitely has good long term prospects as an accounting software distributor. Albert decides to register a company, ‘MoneyBags Pty Ltd’, and to transfer the business into that company, which he then plans to sell. MoneyBags Pty Ltd is sold to an investor who asks that Albert stay on as the director and manager of the company. The investor organises a contract that requires Albert, as part of the purchase of his company, to promise not to compete against the company in any capacity within a 25 kilometre radius of the company’s location. Albert is also required to promise that he will not use any of the intellectual property or trade secrets of the company in any other enterprise. Albert signs the agreement. Albert leaves the company after only 6 months employment due to a dispute over his working hours. Albert’s wife registers a new company, ‘MyBags Pty Ltd’ to run an accounting software business, similar to the one that Albert previously established. Albert is employed within the company but is neither a shareholder nor director. The investor in Albert’s original company is concerned and threatens to take legal action against both Albert and MyBags Pty Ltd. Required: With reference to relevant legal principles use the IRAC legal problem-solving approach to advise Albert whether he can rightfully work for MyBags Pty Ltd and what rights the new owner of MoneyBags Pty Ltd may have against Albert? (20 marks) LAW6000_Assessment 2_Case Study Page 4 of 9 Question 3 ( 20 marks) Rounder Tyres Pty Ltd was a company that conducted a tyre wholesale business. The Racer family held all the shares in the company and Tom Racer and his wife Sally were directors. The company had not been doing very well for some months as there was fierce competition in the tyre market. In spite of this the board of directors kept on allowing the purchase of more tyres to store in the warehouse. It was clear that the last few orders could not be paid when the time for payment was due. At the time when the company was in a financially precarious position, the company granted a 5 year lease of the premises it owned at a fixed rent substantially below current market value to two of its directors. The lease contract included an option in favour of the tenants (directors) to buy the premises again at a fixed price substantially lower than the market value. The granting of the lease together with the option was authorised at a general meeting of the shareholders of the company. Five months after the lease was granted the company went into liquidation. The creditors are very upset as they believe the lease should not have been granted and they want to take action against Rounder Tyres Pty Ltd. Required: With reference to relevant legal principles use the IRAC legal problem-solving approach to advise Explain whether the directors breached any of their duties owed to the company? If so discuss the defences (if any) that may be available to them. (20 marks) Question 4 ( 20 marks) Morris has become very interested in painting and sculpture. He works on his art hobbies after work and on weekends when he has plenty of free time. Recently he became interested in the idea of cement and concrete sculpture and decided to experiment in this field. Last week he purchased a small cement mixer for $6,500 from Stony Building Supplies. The cement mixer was manufactured by Concrete Bond Ltd. After work on Friday, he set the machine up and used it as directed. As soon as he switched the machine on he was horrified by the sound of a large internal explosion in the machine caused by a faulty machine part.The machine is now in a state of disrepair. Additionally, fragments from the machine shattered Judy’s windows. Judy is Morris’ next-door neighbour. Part of the shattered glass hit Judy in the face and eye. She is now hospitalised and will be unable to look after her elderly parents for the next few months. They rely on her for assistance with cooking, shopping and cleaning of their home. LAW6000_Assessment 2_Case Study Page 5 of 9
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT501 Business Environment Assessment 1A
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF; Part A Subject Code and Title MGT501 Business Environment Assessment Part A: Initial Statement of Intent Individual/Group Individual Length 1000 words Learning Outcomes This assessments addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Develop and apply a conceptual understanding of reflective practice in a business context. b) Critically evaluate economic principles and stakeholders viewpoints in business environments. Submission 12 Week Delivery: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4) Intensive Class: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2 (week 2) Weighting 25% Total Marks 25 marks Context: Self-reflection is a way of assessing yourself and the way you work and study. Reflecting helps in developing your skills further and linking practice with theory. It is about analysing what you do and why you do it and applying what you have learned in the future. Reflective self-awareness leads to better leadership skills and performance. More importantly, an enhanced understanding of oneself also provides a solid basis for empathy and leading others. In Assessment 1, Part A, the focus will be on you to reflect on the motivation for undertaking postgraduate studies and expectations regarding the course and ensuing career path. Part B, which is due in module 6, requires you to revisit Part A and do a short video presentation on your learning experience and thinking, and how they might have evolved during the course of the subject. Instructions: MGT501_ Assessment 1 Part A _ Initial Statement of Intent Page 2 of 6 Assessment 1; Part A is a statement of intent which should document your intentions regarding your studies at Torrens University and how they might help you develop professionally. The purpose of this reflective assessment is to help you become aware of your thinking and how it can be used in describing, analysing and evaluating learning experiences. • How do you define business? • Why did you choose this course? • What kind of past experience (or interest) do you have in this area? • How has your experience (academic, work, etc.) prepared you for this course? • How do you ensure the required outcomes of your course are met? • What can you do to manage and monitor your studies to a successful conclusion? • As you think about the future, how might you apply your studies in later life? • What kind of goals would you like to set for yourself with regards to this course? Your Assessment 1; Part A should also include a brief description of your initial understanding of Business Environment and Economic Principles. In writing your reflective statement of intent, you should justify your choice of studies; identify how your studies relate to your own experiences and how you may apply your knowledge in the future. Think carefully about your previous experiences and current expectations. Your statement should be clear and succinct showing that you have short-term and long-term goals and an understanding of what you want to do with your degree. Please Note: Your statement of intent is a reflexive writing piece, to be presented in the first person (I, Me, My, Mine) and should be written in accordance with the following: • You should write in the first person, because this is about YOU, your reflections and your interpretations. (e.g. “I considered this advice to be…... because it had a big impact on my……...and it helped me to understand my………...”). • Try to be as specific as possible, use brief examples to illustrate your points and select examples that enable you to demonstrate learning against the attributes in the rubric. • All other principles of academic writing apply, including strict referencing, acknowledgement of the work of others and avoidance of plagiarism. Submission Instructions: Submit Assessment 1 Part A: Initial Statement of Intent in the submission link in the main navigation menu in MGT501 Business Environment by the end of Module 2.2 (week 4). Intensive Class: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2 (week 2). A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. MGT501_ Assessment 1 Part A _ Initial Statement of Intent Page 3 of 6 Marking Rubric: Your reports will be marked against the rubric, which is shown on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all three of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT501 Business Environment Assessment 1B
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF; Part B Subject Code and Title MGT501 Business Environment Assessment Part B; Statement of Intent Final Individual/Group Individual Length Video – 5 minutes Learning Outcomes This assessments addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Develop and apply a conceptual understanding of reflective practice in a business context. b) Critically evaluate economic principles and stakeholder viewpoints in business environments c) Analyse and synthesise the fundamentals of business in the contemporary environment. d) Construct and justify a professional value proposition as a business practitioner. Submission 12 Week Delivery: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.1 (week 11) Intensive Class: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6 (week 6) Weighting 25% Total Marks 25 marks Context: Self-reflection is a way of assessing yourself and the way you work and study. Reflecting helps in developing your skills further and linking practice with theory. It is about analysing what you do and why you do it and applying what you have learned in the future. Reflective self-awareness leads to better leadership skills and performance. More importantly, an enhanced understanding of oneself also provides a solid basis for empathy and leading others. In part A, the focus was on you to reflect on the motivation for undertaking postgraduate studies and expectations regarding the course and ensuing career path. Part B requires you to revisit Part A and develop a short video presentation on your learning experience and thinking, and how they might have evolved during the course of the subject. Instructions: MGT501_ Assessment 1 Part B Statement of Intent Final Page 2 of 7 In this subject, you have been introduced to the foundational concepts of business and reflective skills. Assessment 1 Part B is about you reflecting on the learning and how your learning can be applied in your journey of becoming a business practitioner. Your task is to prepare a 5-minute individual video presentation about your learning experience in this subject comparing and contrasting your thinking at the start of the subject versus the end. Focus on how this subject has shaped your thinking about business and future career aspirations. Your video may also include any lessons you have learnt throughout this subject, for example, identifying strategies you can transfer to your professional life. Please Note: Powerpoint/Prezi slides are NOT permitted. You will need to find ways of addressing the audience in a compelling manner, paying attention to audio quality, lighting quality, sincerity of presentation, clarity of your perspective and overall impact. Presentation Content: In the presentation, students are required to: • Introduce themselves • Describe how their understanding of business has changed since the start of this subject • Outline professional objectives and how they might apply their learning in this subject to achieve those objectives Presentation Questions: Presentations should address the following questions, along with any other relevant points: • Has your definition of business, economic principals and business environment changed? • What are some of your professional goals? • How does what you have learned relate to the present and future? • What do you want to learn more about, and how could it help in your professional development? • As you think about the future, how might you apply your learning experiences in later life? • What could you do to further your professional development outside of formal studies? Submission Instructions: (1) Creating your video presentation • Create a short video presentation, length: 5 minutes o Be specific and clear, as you will be assessed on originality and authenticity • Your presentation must be in video format (mp4, MOV, etc.) for uploading into Blackboard (refer to the link below) (2) Uploading your video presentation • Detailed instructions on compressing (if necessary) and uploading video presentation is available at https://laureate- MGT501_
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT501 Business Environment Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT501 Business Environment Assessment Internal and External Stakeholder Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length 2,500 words Learning Outcomes This assessments addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: c) Analyse and synthesise the fundamentals of business in the contemporary environment. d) Construct and Justify a professional value proposition as a business practitioner Submission 12 Week Delivery: By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 5.2 (week 10) Intensive Class: Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 5 (week 5) Weighting 50% Total Marks 50 marks Context: Business stakeholder analysis is a technique for identifying stakeholders and analysing their roles. The aim of the analysis is to map out the stakeholders’ level of influence and degree of interest with regards to the business. Stakeholder analysis can also be used to assess the relationships between different stakeholders and the issues they care about most. Internal stakeholders are individuals or groups who are directly involved in the business, such as owners, board members, managers, employees, and investors. External stakeholders are indirectly influenced by the business activities, like customers, suppliers, competitors, society and government. By understanding both perspectives, the business can engage and enhance communication with relevant stakeholders, reduce or prevent risks, identify business opportunities, improve internal stakeholders’ commitment in the business and the reputation of the business amongst external stakeholders. Instructions: In this assessment, you will examine a business in an industry that you have either previously worked in or would like to in the future. Leading up to the assessment submission, you must MGT501_ Assessment 2_Internal and External Stakeholder Analysis Page 2 of 6
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT502 Business Communication Assessment 1A
ASSESSMENT 1A BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT502 Business Communication Assessment Part A: Annotated Bibliography Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Apply research, academic and communication skills appropriate to the level of study and observe academic referencing requirements b) Critically analyse texts and/or multimedia material in both a business and academic context Submission 12 Week Delivery: Due by 11:55pm AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 5) Intensive class: Due by 11:55pm AEDT Sunday of Module 3.1 (week 3) Weighting 30 % Total Marks 30 marks MGT502_Assessment_1A_Brief_Annotated Bibliography_Module 3.1 Page 2 of 5 Instructions In this assessment, you will address a contemporary organisational or business issue and apply research skills to identify, select and analyse 10 sources to form an annotated bibliography. The issue and resources used in Assessment 1A will also form the basis for Assessment 1B – Forming an Argument. When choosing a topic, consider the following: • Locate material (books, periodicals, white papers and other documents) that may contain useful information and ideas on your issue. • Briefly examine and review the items and select 10 that represent a variety of perspectives on the issue. • Write an annotation of 150 words for each reference summarising the central theme and scope. The annotation should include one or more sentences that, o evaluate the authority or background of the author o comment on the intended audience o compare or contrast this work with another you have cited o explain how this work illuminates your bibliography topic • Reference the book, article, or document using APA 6th style in the reference list. Be sure to review a variety of resources before selecting the 10 most suitable ones. Please include a title page, use the APA 6th referencing style, and list the materials in alphabetical order. Students are responsible for: • Staying within the word limit • Keeping drafts and backups of their assignment • Submitting the assignment via Blackboard by the due date • Ensuring their assignment is written and submitted while observing and committing to the Academic Integrity policy Please note that if you require an extension for this assignment, you must apply using the university application form and provide verifiable evidence of extenuating circumstances before the due date and include your most recent draft. Please also treat the prescribed word limit as a limit not to be breached. Referencing: It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing MGT502_Assessment_1A_Brief_Annotated Bibliography_Module 3.1 Page 3 of 5 Submission Instructions: Submit your assignment in Assessment 1A – Annotated Bibliography submission link in the main navigation menu in MGT502 Business Communication by 11:55 pm AEST. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your assessment will be marked against the rubric which is shown on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all three of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT502 Business Communication Assessment 1B
ASSESSMENT 1B BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT502 Business Communication Assessment Part B: Forming an Argument Individual/Group Individual Length Up to a page Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Apply research, academic and communication skills appropriate to the level of study and observe academic referencing requirements b) Critically analyse texts and/or multimedia material in both a business and academic context c) Identify and apply effective communication methods within a business and academic environment Submission 12 Week Delivery: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Friday of Module 4.1 (week 7) Intensive class: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Sunday of Module 4.1 (week 4) Weighting 20 % Total Marks 20 marks MGT502_Assessment_1B_Brief_Forming an Argument_Module 4.1 Page 2 of 5 Instructions In this assessment, you will form an argument to express a point of view and support it with evidence. The issue and supporting evidence for your argument should be based on the materials used in Assessment 1A – Annotated Bibliography. When choosing a claim for the argument, consider the following: • Use the annotated bibliography material from Assessment 1A for sourcing evidence and ideas for your argument. • Review the resources critically and select at least 5 to be used as references in this assessment. • Write an argument (up to a page) considering the following: o a good argument is convincing whereby the premises are acceptable, the supporting evidence is relevant to the claim and provides sufficient grounds for acceptance of the claim o make a clear point and justify it o write in an essay form with a logical structure 1. A short introduction with a claim. 2. Main body with a logical structure including supporting evidence from academic sources. 3. A concise conclusion which restates your claim and summarises your argument. o indicate logical connections and use connecting words • Please include a title page and a reference list using APA 6th style on a separate page. Students are responsible for: • Staying within the word limit • Keeping drafts and backups of their assignment • Submitting the assignment via Blackboard by the due date • Ensuring their assignment is written and submitted while observing and committing to the Academic Integrity policy Please note that if you require an extension for this assignment, you must apply using the university application form and provide verifiable evidence of extenuating circumstances before the due date and include your most recent draft. Please also treat the prescribed word limit as a limit not to be breached. Referencing: It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing MGT502_Assessment_1B_Brief_Forming an Argument_Module 4.1 Page 3 of 5 Submission Instructions: Submit your assignment in Assessment 1B – Forming an Argument submission link in the main navigation menu in MGT502 Business Communication by 11:55 pm AEST. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your assessment will be marked against the rubric shown on the next two pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all three of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT502 Business Communication Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT502 Business Communication Assessment Discussion Forum: Exemplary Business Communication Individual/Group Individual Length Total of 900 words: 1st Post: 300 words 2nd Post: 300 words 3rd Post: 300 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Apply research, academic and communication skills appropriate to the level of study and observe academic referencing requirements b) Critically analyse texts and/or multimedia material in both a business and academic context c) Identify and apply effective communication methods within a business and academic environment d) Evaluate the use and importance of technology within a business environment Submission 12 Week Delivery: 1st Post: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Friday of Module 4.2 (week 8) 2nd Post: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Friday of Module 5.1 (week 9) 3rd Post: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Friday of Module 5.2 (week 10) Intensive Delivery: 1st Post: Intensive class: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Sunday of Module 4.2 (week 4) 2nd Post: Intensive class: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Sunday of Module 5.1 (week 5) 3rd Post: Intensive class: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Sunday of Module 5.2 (week 5) Weighting 30 % (10 % per post) Total Marks 30 marks MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 4.2 Page 2 of 6 Business communication can either be internal, within a business organisation, or external, between the organisation and its existing and potential customers. This assessment supports students in developing their skills and knowledge in selected business communication methods, including an examination of the theoretical underpinnings of communication in business. This assessment has been designed to: • Appraise students’ ability to academically research and evaluate characteristics of effective business communication. • Apply critical thinking skills utilising supporting evidence to justify arguments. • Students are expected to demonstrate practical understanding of application of business communication skills and their importance in professional development. Guidelines Assessment 2 consists of three (3) posts on the Assessment 2 Discussion Forum. For an acceptable result, you must submit all three posts. Using the Assessment 2 Discussion Forum provided in Blackboard, students are required to discuss the characteristics of a specific type of exemplary business communication such as reports, internal communication methods, business proposals, etc. (decided by the facilitator). Post 1: Analyse characteristics of exemplary business communication (300 words) Instructions: Investigate the form of business communication chosen by the facilitator and research what makes it effective. Critically analyse specific characteristics and justify your choices. Consider using examples to back up your statements. Key points to consider in your initial post: • Your post should analyse ideal characteristics of a specific type of business communication. • Include justifications for your chosen characteristics. • Consider using one or more specific examples to add value to your post. • You must include reference to literature. o Use at least 2 in-text citations per post. o Reference the book, article, or document using APA 6th style in the reference list. Please ensure your original post is in the discussion forum by 11:55 pm AEST Post 2: Critique one peer post (300 words) Instructions: Each student is required to critique an original post of a peer. MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 4.2 Page 3 of 6 Your critique should include commentary on: • Whether the original post is comprehensive. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback. • Have all plausible characteristics been identified? • Are one or more examples provided? Provide a critique on the examples and their suitability in supporting statements. • You must include reference to literature. o Use at least 2 in-text citations per post. o Reference the book, article, or document using APA 6th style in the reference list. Please ensure your original post is in the discussion forum by 11:55 pm AEST Post 3: Summarise learning (300 words) Instructions: Each student is required to summarise key points they have learned from the discussion on the Discussion Forum. Your post should include commentary on: • How this discussion has added to your understanding of effective business communication. • What are the 3 key points you have learned from the discussion and how you can apply that knowledge in the future. • Give one or more practical examples of how to apply that knowledge in your professional development. • You must include reference to the literature. o Use at least 2 in-text citations per post. o Reference the book, article, or document using APA 6th style in the reference list. Please ensure your original post is in the discussion forum by 11:55 pm AEST Students are responsible for: • Staying within the word limit • Keeping drafts and backups of their assignment • Submitting the assignment via Blackboard by the due date • Ensuring their assignment is written and submitted while observing and committing to the Academic Integrity policy Please note that if you require an extension for this assignment, you must apply using the university application form and provide verifiable evidence of extenuating circumstances before the due date and include your most recent draft. Please also treat the prescribed word limit as a limit not to be breached. Referencing:
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT502 Business Communication Assessment 3
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT502 Business Communication Assessment Presentation – Exemplary Business Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length 5 minutes Face-to-face students: presentation in class with 5-10 slides Online students: video presentation Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes: a) Apply research, academic and communication skills appropriate to the level of study and observe academic referencing requirements c) Identify and apply effective communication methods within a business and academic environment d) Evaluate the use and importance of technology within a business environment Submission 12 Week Delivery: Online students: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Friday of Module 6.1 (week 11) Face-to-face students: Facilitator to advise students on the exact date of presentation (the student will present during week 11) Intensive Online students: Due by 11:55 pm AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 (week 6) Weighting 20 % Total Marks 20 marks MGT502_Assessment_3_Brief_Presentation_Module 6.1 Page 2 of 5 Instructions You are required to prepare a 5-minute presentation identifying aspects of a specific type of exemplary business presentation such as sales pitches, progress reports, business proposals etc. (decided by facilitator). Describe the elements included in a successful delivery giving examples and practical recommendations. • Face-to-face students should present their findings using 5-10 PowerPoint slides or Prezi. • Online students may use visual aids in their video but should address the audience directly paying attention to audio quality, lighting quality, sincerity of presentation, clarity of your perspective, and overall impact. Presentation Content: In the presentation, students are required to: • Introduce themselves • Describe aspects of a specific type of effective business presentation (decided by the facilitator) • Give examples and practical recommendations on how to succeed in delivery • Deliver their speech in a compelling manner with clarity, conciseness, and concreteness • Develop a conclusion. Presentation Questions: Presentations should address the following questions, along with any other relevant points: • What does an exemplary business presentation look like? • Which characteristics make it effective? • How does the effectiveness of the presentation affect the outcome? • How can the use of technology improve business communication? • In a business environment, when would you likely use business presentation skills? • What is the main conclusion(s) of your presentation? Students are expected to present their assessment to the class when directed to by the Learning Facilitator. They are expected to be dressed and groomed professionally and to attend and fully participate while their colleagues are presenting. Submission Instructions for online students: Submit your video in Assessment 3 Presentation submission link in the main navigation menu in MGT502 Business Communication by 11:55 pm AEST. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. MGT502_Assessment_3_Brief_Presentation_Module 6.1 Page 3 of 5 Video Submission Instructions for online students: (1) Creating your video presentation • Create a short video presentation, length: 5 minutes o Be specific and clear, as you will be assessed on originality and authenticity o Students are expected to be dressed and groomed professionally • Your presentation must be in video format (mp4, MOV, etc.) for uploading into Blackboard (refer to the link below) (2) Uploading your video presentation • Detailed instructions on compressing (if necessary) and uploading video presentation is available at https://laureateau. blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_4044_1&cont ent_id=_387629_1&mode=reset • Submit the recorded video via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in MGT502 Business Communication. • After uploading your video presentation, retain a copy in a safe place. • The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. • Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your presentation will be marked against the rubric shown on the next two pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all three of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment Reflective Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 750 words Learning Outcomes a) Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying strategic people management and explain how their application enhances organisational and individual performance. c) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem-solving skills to effectively manage people in a range of organisational contexts d) Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks they have to address in the changing environment. e) Develop and justify a model of management cognisant of the organisational minutiae to guide future practice. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday Module 2.1 (week 3) Weighting 15% Total Marks 15 marks Context: Self-awareness creates an opportunity for further development and personal success. This reflective analysis is designed for you to explore the subject’s introductory content and importantly, identify how it relates to your own experiences and how you may use it in the future Instructions: You are required to write a short reflective report covering the content in the first three weeks, that is, all of module one and the first half of module two. More specifically: MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 2 of 6 ? Module 1.1 - The nature of organisations, the role of management and challenges faced ? Module 1.2 - Motivation, influence and power and politics and ? Module 2.1 - Communication, conflict and negotiation In writing your reflective analysis, you should consider the learning resources provided in the respective modules as well as reading more broadly on the relevant topics. Think carefully about what you are reading and what has been discussed in class or in on-line discussions. Identify the key principles and concepts and be sure you know what they mean, why they are important and how they can be applied. Your reflective analysis write up may take a variety of forms but must be within the word limit and include: ? A short introduction. ? An analysis of the relevant module topics including their relevance to you and application. ? A short conclusion. ? Reference list. In reflecting upon the module topics, you should explore questions such as: 1. What is in the content and why is this topic important? 2. How is the topic relevant to you? 3. What has been your past experience in this topical area? 4. What have you learnt from the content so far and how will you use it in the remainder of the subject or in your workplace? The word limit is short, so make use of tables, figures and diagrams as these are not included in your word count. You will be assessed against the learning rubric below and your level of insight and application of knowledge from Modules 1 and 2.1. Referencing: You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you can include in your work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 3 of 6 Submission Instructions: Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis in Assessment 1 Reflective Analysis submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your reports will be marked against the rubric which is show on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all five of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment 3 Part A
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF - PART A Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment Part A: Video Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length Part A Video – 5 to 10 Minutes Learning Outcomes Part A c) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem-solving skills to effectively manage people in a range of organisational contexts d) Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks they have to address in the changing environment. e) Develop and justify a model of management cognisant of the organisational minutiae to guide future practice. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday Module 5.1 (week 9) Weighting Part A 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: This assessment is designed for you to experience the challenges that managers face in thinking strategically, conceptually and analytically to create effective organisations and productive work environments. It is in two parts and this is Part A of Assessment 3. Part A is designed to focus your thinking on more strategic issues from modules five and six in relation to management, people and teams, whilst requiring you to integrate the underlying principles discussed in earlier modules. It is in essence your approach and philosophy to future proofing your organisation (or one you know well). Part B requires you to critique the Part A video of another student based on your knowledge of the underlying principles. MGT600_Assessment 3_Part A_ Video Presentation Page 2 of 7 Instructions: Part A You are to prepare a 5- 10-minute video presentation on your approach to managing your organisation into the future. Your chosen organisation may be your current or recant employer or one with which you are very familiar. The focus of your presentation will be on the topics discussed in modules five and six. For example: ? Creating an ethical organisation ? Leveraging culture and diversity ? Competitive advantage through strategic people management ? Fostering innovation It is best to address genuine challenges the organisation faces in these areas, so discuss other ideas you have with your facilitator. Your presentation must discuss the challenges faced, your vision or strategic objectives and importantly, your approach to managing the required strategies and actions. Whilst you will be focusing on the topics from modules five and six, it is expected that you will bring into consideration any relevant topics from other modules. You must also include lessons you have learnt throughout this subject from activities and previous assessments such as your group assessment. For example, if your chosen topic was about leveraging culture and diversity, you could identify how this was addressed in your assessment group and any learnings you can transfer to your workplace challenge. Presentations must be between 5 to 10 minutes and you are to talk direct to the camera, that is, no presentation slides are required. You may refer to notes as a prompt but are not to read them verbatim. In some respects, this may be like a job interview for a senior management role, so you need to convince the audience that you are capable of addressing and managing the issues faced. NOTE: You must provide a list of references to support your presentation. This can be provided in a separate document and uploaded via the assessment 3 Part A portal. Your presentation will be assessed and graded by the facilitator against the following criteria: 1. Knowledge and understanding of theoretical models 2. Appropriate application of theory to the challenges faced 3. Effective presentation skills – both verbal and non-verbal 4. Use of supporting research MGT600_Assessment 3_Part A_ Video Presentation Page 3 of 7 The learning rubric below shows the weighting and description for each of these requirements. Confidentiality: As your presentation will be viewed by another student for completion of Part B of this assessment, if you have concerns over sensitive company information a fictitious company name may be used. If you have further concerns, please discuss these with your facilitator. Recording Instructions: The recording of your presentation needs to be of a reasonable quality. Using your mobile/cell phone or computer would suffice. Creating your video presentation: ? Create a short video presentation (Length: 5-10 minutes) ? Be specific and clear as you will be assessed on originality and authenticity. ? Your presentation must be in a video format (mp4, MOV, etc.) for uploading into Blackboard (refer to the link below). Tips on filming a video presentation is available at: https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-3310931-dt-content-rid-82324_1/institution/Groupwide/Submit%20Video%20Online%20Part%201%20Filming%20v2.pdf Referencing: You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you can include in your work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing 1) Submission Instructions for grading: o Submit Assessment 3 Part A digital presentation via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. o Make sure you save your video in .mp4 file format and follow the correct naming convention by putting your name and student number in the file name. Once you have added your video, click ‘Browse your Computer’ to attach your Reference list in a Word document to the same submission.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment 3 Part B
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF - PART B Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams Assessment Part B: Peer Review Individual/Group Individual Length Part B Peer Review – up to 1250 words Learning Outcomes Part B a) Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying strategic people management and explain how their application enhances organisational and individual performance. b) Critically evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches and the relationships between effective people management and organisational performance. Submission Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday Module 6.1 (week 11) Weighting Part B 25% Total Marks 25 marks Context: This assessment is designed for you to experience the challenges that managers face in thinking strategically, conceptually and analytically to create effective organisations and productive work environments. You will need to clearly communicate your ideas and critique the ideas of others. Assessment 3 is in two parts and this is Part B. In Part A, the thinking focused on strategic issues from modules five and six in relation to management, people and teams, whilst forcing you to integrate the underlying principles discussed in earlier modules. Part B requires you to critique the Part A video of another student. Though challenging, this process requires you to consolidate your own understanding of relevant concepts and principles, as well as drawing on your communication skills to provide effective feedback. MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_Peer Review.Docx Page 2 of 6 Instructions: Part B You will be required to review the Part A video presentation of another student. Your facilitator will pair you with another student and you will be provided with a link to view the relevant presentation. You are not required to meet, hold discussions with or provide any feedback to the other student. Your review is submitted to the facilitator only. This review will be a written response of no more than 1250 words and whilst you will have limited information and understanding of the other student’s context and challenges, you are to provide feedback in the following: ? Consideration of relevant theory and concepts and their application to the issues raised. ? Integration of concepts and appreciation of their implications ? Communication style and effectiveness ? Strengths of the presentation ? Areas for development or further consideration Your response should take into consideration the key principles discussed in relation to communication and performance management. A constructive review will require you to have a solid understanding of all topics covered in this subject. Your review may take a variety of forms but must be within the word limit and include: ? Cover page ? A short introduction ? A review of the presentation including the points mentioned above ? A short conclusion ? Reference list Your review will be assessed against the learning rubric below taking into consideration the above requirements. Referencing: You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you can include in your work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment 1A
ASSESSMENT 1 PART A BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment Assessment 1, Part A: Self-Reflective Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 500 words Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to build self-awareness e) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive practice as a means of continuous learning and self-development. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday at end of Module 2.2 (Week 4) Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: The learning design of this subject is to focus on your own leadership journey and not to study leadership as some remote, theoretical concept that applies to other people. Assessment 1, Part A, starts to build self-awareness by analysing your results on the Gallup Strengths Finder psychometric instrument. Assessment 1, Part B, increases your self-awareness through a reflexive journal, working with your partner, understanding your current capabilities and preparing a report on your leadership journey to the present time. Assessment 2 is a report on your plans for your continuing leadership development. The assessment reports should build on each other and should be seen as an integrated plan for your continuing personal and professional development. Your Task: Your task in Assessment 1, Part A, is to complete the Gallup Strengths Finder and submit a brief report on the results and their implications for your development as a leader. Instructions for completing Gallup strength finder: MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 1 Part A brief Page 2 of 4 REGISTRATION Navigate to the StrengthsQuest OS website at the following URL: https://laureateANZ.gallup.com See further instructions under Assessment 1 brief in the LMS for detailed instructions to begin the test online. It is highly recommended to set aside 30 minutes of non-interrupted time to complete this test as the questions are set on a short timer to capture initial and instinctual responses. Analysing results: When you receive your results, look at your report and read the background document on the Gallup psychometric assessment. You should then prepare a 500-word report which covers the following issues: 1) A brief description of your results. Provide a copy of your report as an Appendix. It will not be included in the word count. 2) Your initial reactions to your results: any surprises, any concerns, any connections with your own self-perceptions of your leadership strengths and personality preferences, any consistencies or inconsistencies with other feedback that you have received, either from colleagues or other psychometric tests. 3) Your initial thoughts on the implications of the results for your current and future leadership: how you can draw on your strengths to enhance your current and future effectiveness. Reflexive Writing - First Person: You should write in the first person, because this is about YOU, your reflections and your interpretations. (e.g. “I considered this advice to be….. because it had a big impact on my……..and it helped me to understand my………..”) Try to be as specific as possible, use brief examples to illustrate your points and try to select examples that enable you to demonstrate learning against the attributes in the rubric. All other principles of academic writing apply, including strict referencing, acknowledgement of the work of others and avoidance of plagiarism. A brief guide to Reflective Writing is available at: Laureate academic skills unit (LASU) (n.d). Reflective writing skills. https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498857_1&mode=reset MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 1 Part A brief Page 3 of 4 Referencing: You should include a list of specific references that you have actually used in your report. For this assessment, a minimum of three journal articles, academic papers or textbooks is expected. References to any secondary sources or web sites are additional. The reference list and Executive Summary (if you choose to use one) and any appendices will not be included in the word count. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions: Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis in Assessment 1 Part A submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your reports will be marked against the rubric which is show on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all four of the Assessment Criteria in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment 1B
ASSESSMENT 1 PART B BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment Assessment 1, Part B: Reflexive Report Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 2,000 words Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to build self-awareness b) Through critical reflection on key leadership theories develop a personal leadership development strategy. c) Analyse and develop the capacity to influence, motivate and inspire others in your workplace and/or community organisations. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday at end of Module 4.1 (Week 7) Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 marks Context: The learning design of this subject is to focus on your own leadership journey and not to study leadership as some remote, theoretical concept that applies to other people. This assessment enables you to build self-awareness and a clear sense of how you came to be the person and emerging leader that you are today. It encourages deep reflection on your life and leadership journey to your present position. It helps you to increase your understanding of your current leadership capabilities and potential. The assessment requires you to establish a mentoring relationship with another student in the class so that you can provide mutual learning support and exchange constructive feedback with each other. In addition to this classmate, you can also request feedback from a trusted colleague in your work, personal or wider student networks. MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 1 Part B Page 2 of 6 Your Task: Your task in Assessment 1 Part B is to reflect on you own leadership journey up until now, your current role or position, how you influence others, how you lead, contribute to or react to organisational and cultural changes and your current level of self-awareness and self-confidence to lead others in your organisation and/or community. Assessment 2, which is due at the end of WEEK 11, builds on the first and asks you to prepare a plan for the next stage of your leadership journey. The assessments are integrated pieces of work and you should bear in mind the final part as you work on this part. All assessments need to be strongly based on the established theories and models of leadership to help you interpret and explain your leadership challenges. Working with Your Partner [this is 20% (Criterion 2) of your overall assessment]: You need to be proactive to connect with other students in your on-line/ face-to-face class, once you post your personal introduction on the “Welcome and Introductions” Discussion Forum. On-line students can select a partner from class mates who have posted introductions, or choose a trusted colleague from your work, student or personal networks. On-line students need to take responsibility for selecting and interacting with a partner. Face-to-face students will be guided by your facilitator, taking into account diversity of backgrounds to enrich your learning experience. More detailed guidelines for working with your partner are provided at the end of this section. • Key points from the feedback you receive from your partner and others, combined with your reflection and interpretation of this feedback in the context of your leadership journey, needs to be included in your report. • You may wish to also include key points of the feedback that you gave your partner and reflect on it. Feedback often says as much about the person who gives as the person who receives it. • The feedback summaries/ transcripts can be included as appendices, where they will not be included in the word count. While the assessment includes feedback from the interaction with your partner, each person is to submit his or her own, individual report. More detailed guidelines for working with your partner are shown at the end of this brief. Possible Structure: MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 1 Part B Page 3 of 6 A possible structure for your report is shown below. This is a suggestion only and is not mandatory. Other structures would be appropriate, provided that they enable you to demonstrate your learning according to the rubric shown in the brief for the first assessment. 1. A clear logic flow, using a “Contents” page and section headings, will help your readers to follow your thinking. 2. The use of an “Executive Summary” will tell your reader the key points of your report, including recommendations for action. 3. An “Introduction” to set the context 4. The body of your report should address the following issues. The percentages in brackets indicate a suggested proportional length of each section. Give appropriate sub-headings to each Part of this ‘body’. • Your current/recent role, responsibilities and leadership challenges in your organisation or community. (10%) • Key aspects of your leadership journey so far (eg who influenced you, how you formed your self-image as a leader, any critical events that have been influential). This should not be a chronology or a CV. It is a reflection on a small number of the most influential aspects or turning points in your leadership development. (15%) • The results of the Gallup Strengths Finder and any other personality or leadership style inventories that you have completed and your interpretation of the results. This can be a summary of the report (key details) that you presented for Assessment 1 – Part A. (15%) • Key feedback points on your current leadership style, capabilities, effectiveness, interpersonal and social skills associated with Emotional Intelligence, personality assessments etc, that you have received from your partner and other trusted sources. (20%) • The implications of the feedback and your reflection on its significance. It could include your preliminary thinking on what you do about it, to be expanded in your second submission. (30%) • Link to theory and conceptual frameworks that explain or clarify your experiences and feedback. (You could incorporate the links to theory/models throughout your report or collect them in one section. The important point is that you anchor your submission with appropriate models or theories. (20%) MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 1 Part B Page 4 of 6 5. A “Conclusion” to capture your key learnings is desirable in a business subject. Detailed, supporting information such as psychometric results and planning templates should be placed in an appendix, where they will not be included in the word count. Reflexive Writing - First Person: You should write in the first person, because this is about YOU, your reflections and your interpretations. (eg “I considered this advice to be….. because it had a big impact on my……..and it helped me to understand my………..”). Try to be as specific as possible, use brief examples to illustrate your points and try to select examples that enable you to demonstrate learning against the attributes in the rubric. All other principles of academic writing apply, including strict referencing, acknowledgement of the work of others and avoidance of plagiarism. Referencing: Include a list of specific references that you have actually used in your report. For this assessment, a minimum of three journal articles, academic papers or textbooks from within the subject module as a starting point is expected. References to any secondary sources or web sites are additional. The reference list and Executive Summary and any appendices will not be included in the word count. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT601 Dynamic Leadership Assessment Assessment 2 : Leadership Plan Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 3,000 words Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to build self-awareness. b) Through critical reflection on key leadership theories develop a personal leadership development strategy. c) Analyse and develop the capacity to influence, motivate and inspire others in your workplace and/or community organisations. d) Implement and practice coaching others to enhance self-awareness and core communication skills for emotional intelligence, with emphasis on active listening, building empathy, giving and receiving feedback. e) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive practice as a means of continuous learning and self-development. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday at end of Module 6 .1 (Week 11) Weighting 50% Total Marks 50 marks Context: The purpose of all assessments, combined, is to reflect on your own leadership journey, obtain feedback from your assigned partner and other trusted sources, evaluate your current leadership style, effectiveness and potential and then prepare a plan for your continued development as a leader. The assessments are integrated pieces of work and you should draw on the first parts as you work on this final part. The first assessment focused on your journey so far and current capabilities. This final assessment report should present your plans for your future development as a leader. MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 2 Page 2 of 5 Your Task: The task for this assessment is to prepare and present a plan for your development as a leader. The period of your plan could be 2, 5 or 10 years. Select the period that makes most sense to you, depending on the current stage of your life and career. Briefly explain the reason for the time period that you have selected. Your plan needs to be based on or anchored by an established model of personal development. A number of possible models were provided in Module 1. The choice of a model is up to you. The Whitman GROW and Boyatzis Intentional Change models are two of the most comprehensive at a personal level. However, other models may be more relevant to your current needs. You are also welcome to use an appropriate model that was not included in Module 1, provided it meets the tests of academic rigour and usefulness to you. Provide a brief description of your chose model and a justification for your selection. It is important that you go to the source documents and not rely only on the summary version of your chosen model. Additional information on leadership development to help you prepare your plan and to continue your reflexive journal is provided in the subject Resources section of each module. Structure: The precise structure is up to you. A clear logic flow, using a “Contents” page and section headings, will help your readers to follow your thinking. The use of an “Executive Summary” as a précis or abstract of your report, an “Introduction” to set the context and a “Conclusion” to capture your key learnings is desirable in a business subject. Detailed, supporting information such as psychometric results, planning templates, etc., should be placed in an appendix, where they will not be included in the word count. Within the body of your report, the model of development that you choose will largely determine the structure and section headings. Reflexive Writing - First Person: You should write in the first person, because this is about YOU, your reflections and your interpretations. (eg “I considered this advice to be….. because it had a big impact on my……..and it helped me to understand my………..”). Try to be as specific as possible, use brief examples to illustrate your points and try to select examples that enable you to demonstrate learning against the attributes in the rubric. All other principles of academic writing apply, including strict referencing, acknowledgement of the work of others and avoidance of plagiarism. MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 2 Page 3 of 5 Referencing: You should include a list of specific references that you have actually used in your report. For this assessment, a minimum of three journal articles, academic papers or textbooks is expected. References to any secondary sources or web sites are additional. The reference list and Executive Summary (if you choose to use one) and any appendices will not be included in the word count. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions: Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis in Assessment 2 submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your reports will be marked against the rubric which is show on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all five of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT602 Business Decision Analytics
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT602 Business Decision Analytics Assessment Case Study Individual/Group Group (Three (3) people per group) Length Up to 3000 words per group Learning Outcomes b) Compare, contrast and critically evaluate sources of data as influences for decision-making in a range of business contexts c) Examine and evaluate decision making systems and techniques to engage group decisions and analyse how these can enhance sustainable outcomes d) Critically examine emerging tools and technologies for decision making Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 4.2 (Week 8) Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks Context: Western society generally places greater value on the individual over the group by expecting individuals to make fast and high-quality decisions with group-based decisions regarded as much less important. However, this idea is often challenged, as we are more likely to be involved with others in our decision making than ever before. After all, ‘two heads are better than one’, inferring that three heads can therefore be better than two, and so on. Researchers have added to this idea suggesting that groups make more innovative decisions due to diversity of membership and the related advantages of difference ‘creative tension’. But there are challenges with research also sighting the group- based phenomena of: ‘groupthink’, or group-based information processing biases; overly directive leadership and errors in communication exchanges as potential short group related shortcomings. Being aware of these deficiencies in group-based functioning and working to overcome these flaws in groups’ information processing and decision making are very much the prerequisite of the innovative, smart thinking, effective group member, and will form the focus of Assessment 2. Assessment two provides opportunities for you: ? To work at both the level of the individual and as a team member in identifying data from different sources and contexts in your information processing, decision making. MGT602_ Assess 2_ Case Study Page 2 of 12 ? To form up a with others in a team and share your MBTI results, decision preferences and any other psychometric tests which can help the team identify and act on differences between each other’s information preferences, decision styles, abilities and willingness to work together in a team. ? To work as a team member in identifying differences in information processing preferences, decision styles and ways of working together to best engage the team in the data evaluation, information processing, use of decision-making systems and techniques to enable fast, high quality group decisions. Instructions At the end of Module 2 (week 4) your facilitator will place you into groups of three. ? By the end of week four (4) you will need to establish who are your team members, where you are situated and an agreed means of communicating virtually with one another. ? Thought will have to be given to constructing an information management base from the data made available to you and around which your team’s decisions, conclusions, recommendations and justifications can be made, and your assignment written up and submitted. Scenario You are one member of a three (3) person team of line managers to form a panel with the task of business cost containment in an organisation of 300 people. The importance and urgency of your panel’s work relates to the business having recently lost two key products from their product line. Both products have been lost to the market through changes to government policy and falling business profitability need to be reversed quickly. The business has concluded that it needs to quickly reduce its wage-salary costs to survive into the next period. Executive management has decided to set up a panel to advise on ways of quickly reducing wage and salary costs through a reduction in staff numbers as a means of positively addressing problems with the business’s current P&L statement Your team is tasked to analyse a data set provided and come up with a listing of people you are recommending for redundancy. Your team is to select from a list of sixty people and make recommendations on the type and number of people to be made redundant. MGT602 Assessment 2 Data Set Executive management has not stated the exact number of people they want removed from positions but any meaningful reduction in costs for the business would need your panel to recommend at least sixty percent (60%) of those listed being made redundant. However, your team knows this business well and understands the number of staff needed to keep the business running is different from the number of redundancies the panel is being asked to recommend. The panel believes a critical mass of 275 people would be required to keep the business operating reasonably well. Your team will therefore have to provide a very strong argument to support your recommendations and justifications on the types and likely reduced numbers of people to be made redundant. MGT602_ Assess 2_ Case Study Page 3 of 12 The sixty people put forward to the panel for potential redundancy are from similar wage classes and if made redundant will be supported by outplacement to facilitate their transition from the business. The team should note that the list provided is all the information to be made available to the panel for them to reach conclusions and make recommendations and justifications to management. Additionally, the panel should be aware of the need for diversity in workforces, and the ethical, sustainable, legal practices applying to redundancy decisions, and to be familiar with the biases inherent in teams-based decisions and to carry out their data analysis work accordingly. Please Note ? Try to identify differences in decision style and personality between team members in advance of forming up the team (HINT: look back at your assignment one’s treatment of decision preferences and your MBTI results). ? Make yourself aware of established theories, accepted practices relating to group dynamics and group processes. Identify any malfunctioning team behaviour and biases. ? Consider the challenges of working in virtual teams and identify ways in which your team can best communicate making fast, good quality group-based decisions. ? Take account of team members’ individual differences in decision preferences, personalities, styles and difficulties and practical challenges in gaining access to one another when establishing your Team Rules. ? Take note of and reflect on how you worked with your fellow virtual team members by establishing Team Rules to help meet the required assessment outcomes. Work Rules should take the form of: establishing roles; agreeing on meeting times; delegated handling of tasks; setting up reporting lines; dealing with conflict; agreeing on leadership functions; carrying out data analysis and information processing tasks; forming up initial conclusions and reaching decisions; agreeing on and writing up and summarising the team’s conclusions, recommendations and justifications. ? Your assessment response should make good use of relevant, up-to-date decision models and theories, team process and group dynamics theories/practices/ frameworks and taxonomies drawn from scientific research papers, learned articles in support your argument Suggested format Working with your fellow team members and the data provided, identify the number of people to be made redundant, select and list those people and outline your panel’s justifications for WHY they are being recommended for redundancy. Include an outline of the process of data analysis –decision making used by the team in selecting and recommending people for redundancy together with a summary of the team’s redundancy decisions, recommendations and associated justifications. Your group must prepare a Case Study style report which should take the following form and use the headings provided. The team’s recommendations and justifications to management can then follow on from these processes of analysis. ? Cover page ? Executive summary MGT602_ Assess 2_ Case Study Page 4 of 12 ? Table of contents ? Introduction ? Main Discussion o Problem Definition o Situational Analysis o Sense Making o Formulation of potential solutions o Selection between solution o Decision making based on solutions o Implementation of decisions o Testing, Team Feedback on decisions ? Recommendations ? Conclusion ? Appendices You may make any necessary assumptions you deem necessary; however, any significant assumptions should be detailed in your report. Groups will be assessed against the learning rubric below. Teamwork and group participation will constitute 15% of the mark for the assignment for each member of the group. Group participation will be determined as follows: ? Each participant in the team will evaluate the other
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking Assessment Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words) Part B : Critique Individual (250 words) Individual/Group Individual Length Part A: One original post (500 words) Part B: Critique (250 words per follow up post) Learning Outcomes a) Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and its application to contemporary business issues Submission Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4) Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 5) For intensive class: Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 2) Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 3) Weighting Part A: 20% Part B: 20% Total Marks Part A: 20 marks Part B: 20 marks Context: Systems Thinking requires you to take a holistic view of the world we live in and the organisations we work with. This assessment has been prescribed to appraise students’ ability to think holistically and generate discussion around recognising and understanding organisational operations using a Systems Thinking lens. The assessment will broaden your knowledge of and appreciation for using a different approach to look for and solve problems faced by managers in contemporary organisations. This assessment has been designed to MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 2 of 8 • Appraise your ability to academically research and evaluate paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and apply to contemporary business issues. • You are expected to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 to 3.1 in your analysis and discussion, and are required to apply critical thinking, presenting multi-sided findings. • Successful completion of this assessment will help you to further understand Systems Thinking in a practical context. It will also help you to maintain currency in the increasingly changing industry. Guidelines There are two (2) parts to Assessment 1. For an acceptable result, you will complete Part A and Part B of the Assessment. Using the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum provided, students are required to Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words) Instructions: Identify a local or global organisation that is currently facing significant issues and critically analyse how a Systems Thinking approach can assist in making optimal decisions. For example: • You are working as operations manager in a company of your choice. This company has been in business for almost 10 years and is now being confronted with many operational issues related to inventory management. Sometimes there is excess stock and other times shortage of the inventory that are hearting the bottom line performance of the company. In addition to that new competitors and demand from customers to deliver faster and cheaper require organization a different approach rather than just solving the inventory problems. Or • You are working in XYZ bank in your home country that has been struggling with significant loss of customers to competitors. To overcome the problem, the bank has introduced an incentive system for its employees to bring in new customers. Once you have chosen your organisation and connected issue you are then required to prepare and post in the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum at least one (1) original post identifying intended or unintended consequences on various stakeholders of their chosen organisation and then recommend/propose alternative policies/procedures using Systems Thinking approach to help overcome the problem. Key points to consider in your initial post: • Your proposal should be holistic • You must include reference to Systems Thinking literature • Consider using Systems Thinking tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE etc. MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 3 of 8 Students are also required to provide a brief rationale of why it is important to use Systems Thinking and relevant tools and techniques to solve the identified organisational problem to minimise adverse consequences. Please ensure your original posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 2 (week 4) Referencing: It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Part B: Critique Individual (250 words) Instructions: Each student is required to critique an original post (Part A) of two (2) peers. Your Critique should include commentary on • Whether the original post is holistic. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback. • Have all plausible consequences been identified? • Have Systems Thinking tools been used and used properly? Please provide a critique on these tools and there use in solving the problem identified. Please ensure your critique posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 3 (week 5) Referencing: It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Student must actively seek feedback and inputs from peers and facilitator. The individual student should organise discussion notes and upload it on the Blackboard accordingly. Please note the following additional information • This assessment is designed to create robust discussion around Systems Thinking with your peers. Please feel free to post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation of the topic • While presenting your views, you are required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the published literature. This includes journal articles, relevant website links, news article, magazines or text from related books. MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 4 of 8 • The views could be supporting comments or they may be a contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate justification as specified above. • If referring to published literature to support stated views, you are required to provide relevant reference (and citation) in the response. If you can provide appropriate articles to support opinion, it will be valued considerably. • Along with actively participating in the discussions, it is equally important to provide responses, which are relevant and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as one of the most important criteria for evaluating students in Assessment 1, Part B. Submission Instructions: Submit Part A) – Proposal, Individual (500 words) via the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. Submit Part B) - Critique, Individual (250 words) via Assessment 1 Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking Assessment Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words) Part B : Critique Individual (250 words) Individual/Group Individual Length Part A: One original post (500 words) Part B: Critique (250 words per follow up post) Learning Outcomes a) Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and its application to contemporary business issues Submission Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4) Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 5) For intensive class: Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 2) Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 3) Weighting Part A: 20% Part B: 20% Total Marks Part A: 20 marks Part B: 20 marks Context: Systems Thinking requires you to take a holistic view of the world we live in and the organisations we work with. This assessment has been prescribed to appraise students’ ability to think holistically and generate discussion around recognising and understanding organisational operations using a Systems Thinking lens. The assessment will broaden your knowledge of and appreciation for using a different approach to look for and solve problems faced by managers in contemporary organisations. This assessment has been designed to MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 2 of 8 • Appraise your ability to academically research and evaluate paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and apply to contemporary business issues. • You are expected to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 to 3.1 in your analysis and discussion, and are required to apply critical thinking, presenting multi-sided findings. • Successful completion of this assessment will help you to further understand Systems Thinking in a practical context. It will also help you to maintain currency in the increasingly changing industry. Guidelines There are two (2) parts to Assessment 1. For an acceptable result, you will complete Part A and Part B of the Assessment. Using the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum provided, students are required to Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words) Instructions: Identify a local or global organisation that is currently facing significant issues and critically analyse how a Systems Thinking approach can assist in making optimal decisions. For example: • You are working as operations manager in a company of your choice. This company has been in business for almost 10 years and is now being confronted with many operational issues related to inventory management. Sometimes there is excess stock and other times shortage of the inventory that are hearting the bottom line performance of the company. In addition to that new competitors and demand from customers to deliver faster and cheaper require organization a different approach rather than just solving the inventory problems. Or • You are working in XYZ bank in your home country that has been struggling with significant loss of customers to competitors. To overcome the problem, the bank has introduced an incentive system for its employees to bring in new customers. Once you have chosen your organisation and connected issue you are then required to prepare and post in the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum at least one (1) original post identifying intended or unintended consequences on various stakeholders of their chosen organisation and then recommend/propose alternative policies/procedures using Systems Thinking approach to help overcome the problem. Key points to consider in your initial post: • Your proposal should be holistic • You must include reference to Systems Thinking literature • Consider using Systems Thinking tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE etc. MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 3 of 8 Students are also required to provide a brief rationale of why it is important to use Systems Thinking and relevant tools and techniques to solve the identified organisational problem to minimise adverse consequences. Please ensure your original posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 2 (week 4) Referencing: It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Part B: Critique Individual (250 words) Instructions: Each student is required to critique an original post (Part A) of two (2) peers. Your Critique should include commentary on • Whether the original post is holistic. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback. • Have all plausible consequences been identified? • Have Systems Thinking tools been used and used properly? Please provide a critique on these tools and there use in solving the problem identified. Please ensure your critique posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 3 (week 5) Referencing: It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Student must actively seek feedback and inputs from peers and facilitator. The individual student should organise discussion notes and upload it on the Blackboard accordingly. Please note the following additional information • This assessment is designed to create robust discussion around Systems Thinking with your peers. Please feel free to post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation of the topic • While presenting your views, you are required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the published literature. This includes journal articles, relevant website links, news article, magazines or text from related books. MGT603_ Assessment 1_ Part A & Part B Page 4 of 8 • The views could be supporting comments or they may be a contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate justification as specified above. • If referring to published literature to support stated views, you are required to provide relevant reference (and citation) in the response. If you can provide appropriate articles to support opinion, it will be valued considerably. • Along with actively participating in the discussions, it is equally important to provide responses, which are relevant and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as one of the most important criteria for evaluating students in Assessment 1, Part B. Submission Instructions: Submit Part A) – Proposal, Individual (500 words) via the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. Submit Part B) - Critique, Individual (250 words) via Assessment 1 Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT604 Strategic Management Assessment 2 Part A
ASSESSMENT 2 Part A BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT604 Strategic Management Assessment Stakeholder Meeting Simulation and White Paper PART A: Preliminary Outline (Hurdle) Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 500 word outline Learning Outcomes b) Critically evaluate different strategy formulation processes utilised by organisations and evaluate their relevance to particular organisational contexts c) Develop and plan the implementation of a selected strategy for different organisational levels including for change management processes Submission By 11.55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (Week 5) Weighting 10% Total Marks 10 marks Context: The assessment of this subject supports students in developing their skills and knowledge in topics that include environmental assessment, problem diagnosis, strategy development, and cultural and ethical contexts. Stakeholder meetings are a critical element in strategic management. This assessment task provides experience and immersive understanding of the complex interactions involved in the development of strategic choices, and the need to take an integrative approach to problem solving. Instructions PLEASE NOTE: Part A is a Hurdle Assessment and must be submitted. You are required to perform a simulated stakeholder meeting to discuss the scenario below. Students will be assigned a role to play in the simulated stakeholder meeting. Roles will be assigned to ensure each group has one of each of the stakeholders. To do this assessment, it is necessary for you to know the responsibilities and interests of the stakeholder that you are assigned to be. To assist you with this knowledge, each stakeholder’s general scope of responsibilities is described below. It is suggested that you take some time to research more about each stakeholder’s responsibilities so that you can contribute effectively to the meetings and write your white paper. MGT604_Assess 2 Part A Simulation_2018 Page 2 of 7 The white paper is to be completed individually by each member of the team reflecting the impact of the proposed strategy on their particular part of the business and should be completed to the professional standard that would be required if the scenario were real. Please Note : You will be placed in your group in Module 1, week 1 by your facilitator and are expected to conduct at least one (1) stakeholders meeting per week. Times and location are to be arranged by the group. Stakeholders description and interests a) General Manager (GM) of the company The GM has the final accountability to the CEO. The GM takes responsibility of the of the company’s successes and failures of the company. The GM brings together the different functions in the company (HR, Finance, Operations, etc.) and the interests of all the stakeholders. A key issue for the GM is to maximise shareholder value and the long-term sustainability of the company. b) General Manager of key supplier Obviously, the GM of the supplier has the same responsibilities in his company as the GM of the case company below. The supplier is in the business of supplying goods and services which the case company requires. The successes and failures of the supplier company are linked to the successes and failures of the case company. c) Union official General responsibility of the Union official is to represent the interest of workers. It also includes conflict resolution between the employer and the workers and bargaining of behalf of workers. It goes without saying that the workers would want the company to be financially sustainable while they receive appropriate remuneration. d) Operations manager (OM) The general responsibilities of the OM are to ensure that productions of goods and services is running efficiently. Therefore, the role includes both planning and implementing production/manufacturing schedules including material and energy inputs among other things. The OM understands the feasibility of attaining certain production levels and quality of products/services. e) Senior finance manager (SFM) The general responsibilities of the finance manager are to ensure that the company is financially sound. Therefore, the finance manager plans the long and short-term allocation of resources as well as produce financial reports. For example, the SFM would be interested in issues such as risk, capital availability, likely timing and amount of returns, etc. MGT604_Assess 2 Part A Simulation_2018 Page 3 of 7 Pro-Go Pty Ltd Scenario The scenario provides you with a brief overview of a hypothetical project for a real-life organisation. Be aware that the scenario may not cover every detail that you will need to address in the White Paper, in which case, you will need to conduct additional research, including further research into the industry concerned. [Pro-Go Pty Ltd is a privately-owned manufacturer of small, high-quality action cameras based in Geelong, Victoria. Founded in 2004 it has enjoyed continuous year-on-year growth until the last financial year. Pro-Go has a track record of innovation, and technology that provides excellent quality results in a small package able to operate with small batteries for extended periods of time. The video files these cameras produce are known for having superior colour, and operate effectively in lower lighting conditions than competitor’s cameras. They are also marketed on the basis of their extreme ruggedness, and reliability. Much of the technology used in its devices has been patented by Pro-Go and is not currently available to other manufacturers. The Pro-Go management team has recognised that the ability to capture videos is now a feature of most phones. It suggests to them that the future of the stand-alone camera may be limited. Pro-Go’s CEO has requested the executive team meet independently to develop a strategy to guide the company over the next five years.] Deliverables The deliverables required of each student are: 1. Determine three options that exist in adjacent markets or with related but different products or technologies; 2. Nominate the preferred option and state why you believe it to be so; and 3. Discuss the implications specifically relating to your part of the business, and what challenges these might represent. Separate the discussion into short-term and long-term issues. Students are to address the assessment task from the perspective of their own functional area of responsibility. Integrate theory in your white paper. Students will be assessed on the overall quality of their White Paper and their ability to comprehensively address all the areas that should be contained in such a document. Please ensure you are familiar with the marking criteria in the attached rubric before you commence planning your submission. Students should use the brief to guide what to include in the assessment and the rubric below to inform the standard required. Suggested format Your 500 word, individual, Preliminary Outline of your White paper should be structured as follows: MGT604_Assess 2 Part A Simulation_2018 Page 4 of 7 • Executive Summary - Summarise the entire report - i.e., don’t tell the reader that the report discusses the external environment, summarise the points the report makes about the internal environment. • Introduction - Provide background and context to the report. Tell the reader what has happened in the past that has led to this report being needed. • Aim - State in a single sentence what this report is seeking to achieve. • Discussion - Cover the key themes you wish to address. Generally try to address three (3) key themes (as suggested above), and provide three (3) discussion points for each. Remember, you are providing an outline only. This can be comprised of dot points if you choose. Adhere to the word limit and be thoughtful in your response. The first attempt at an outline is rarely comprehensive or correct. Please recognise that this will likely need to be revised through a number of iterations to arrive at an outline that is of impact. Teamwork Log Students should also keep a log of how they have worked together as a team in the delivery of this project. This includes meeting dates and times, meeting minutes/notes, a detailed description of how tasks were allocated and completed (and by whom), copies of emails and/or written discussion regarding the project, and any other evidence of teamwork that students would like to include. All students involved in the project need to check the log before submission. It is assumed that the final submission has been agreed between students as being an accurate record of the work that has taken place for the project. The Teamwork log needs to be submitted with the assessment but is not a part of the overall word count. Submission Instructions:
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT604 Strategic Management Assessment 2 Part B
ASSESSMENT 2 Part B BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT604 Strategic Management Assessment Stakeholder Meeting Simulation and White Paper PART B: Final Submission Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 2,000 words Learning Outcomes b) Critically evaluate different strategy formulation processes utilised by organisations and evaluate their relevance to particular organisational contexts c) Develop and plan the implementation of a selected strategy for different organisational levels including for change management processes Submission By 11.55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 4.2 (Week 8) Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 marks Context: The assessment of this subject supports students in developing their skills and knowledge in topics that include environmental assessment, problem diagnosis, strategy development, and cultural and ethical contexts. Stakeholder meetings are a critical element in strategic management. This assessment task provides experience and immersive understanding of the complex interactions involved in the development of strategic choices, and the need to take an integrative approach to problem solving. The increasing pace of technological change and the increased impact of social media provides many challenges for businesses attempting to navigate towards growth and increased profitability. Rapid cycle times for new products can lead to decisions being made that are not always in the best interests of the long-term survival of the firm. Disruptions to the everyday course of business come from anywhere and need to be responded to often in short time frames. Introduction Assessment 2 Part B continues from scenario in Part A. In Part B, a disruption is introduced which necessitates re-consideration of the white paper done in Part A of the Assessment. Here is a recap of the scenario. Scenario Recap Page 2 of 8 MGT604_Assess 2 Part B Simulation Pro-Go Pty Ltd is a privately-owned manufacturer of small, high-quality action cameras based in Geelong, Victoria. Founded in 2004 it has enjoyed continuous year-on-year growth until the last financial year. Pro-Go has a track record of innovation, and technology that provides excellent quality results in a small package able to operate with small batteries for extended periods of time. The video files these cameras produce are known for having superior colour, and operate effectively in lower lighting conditions than competitor’s cameras. They are also marketed on the basis of their extreme ruggedness, and reliability. Much of the technology used in its devices has been patented by Pro-Go and is not currently available to other manufacturers. The Pro-Go management team has recognised that the ability to capture videos is now a feature of most phones. It suggests to them that the future of the stand-alone camera may be limited. Pro-Go’s CEO has requested the executive team meet independently to develop a strategy to guide the company over the next five years. Instructions Please watch the below video Announcement from the CEO of Pro-Go Pty Ltd. DISRUPTION A number of Pro-Go cameras have burst into flames without an explanation being found. In addition, the company’s largest customer – a major retail chain throughout China – exercised their right, under our sales agreement, to cancel their contract with us. Sales have halved in the last 24 hours and immediate action must be taken. Re-convene the (emergency) stakeholder meetings to address these concerns raised in this video. The stakeholder meetings must discuss this disruption and develop a modified strategic plan/white paper. Please return to your groups immediately to discuss these events and adjust your strategic approach accordingly. Please ensure to address: • Privacy legislation • Technological advances • Connected devices • Adjacent products/adjacent markets Pro-Go Pty Ltd is relying on its management team, of which you are a part, to adjust the strategy developed in previous stakeholder meetings (Assessment 2 Part A) in light of these developments, and for the individual team to finalise their report to the CEO. Suggested format Your 2000 word, individual, White paper should be structured as follows: • Executive Summary - Summarise the entire report - i.e., don’t tell the reader that the report discusses the external environment, summarise the points the report makes about the internal environment. Page 3 of 8 MGT604_Assess 2 Part B Simulation • Table of Contents - Make it look good. Include page numbers and ensure the layout looks balanced on the page. • Introduction - Provide background and context to the report. Tell the reader what has happened in the past that has led to this report being needed. • Aim - State in a single sentence what this report is seeking to achieve. • Discussion - Cover the key themes you wish to address. Generally try to address three (3) key themes, and provide three discussion points for each. • Conclusion - Restate the aim and sum up the discussion to demonstrate to the reader that the aim has been satisfied. There should be no new content in the conclusion. • Recommendations - What are the next steps? What is required to progress into the future? How would you evaluate your recommendations and success? • References - Please ensure you use the correct APA referencing style throughout. Remember EVERY factual statement requires a reference. • Appendices - Additional material to substantiate or add greater depth to the material presented in the report, and your Teamwork log. The white paper is to be completed individually by each member of the team reflecting the impact of the proposed strategy on their particular part of the business after the disruption and should be completed to the professional standard that would be required if the below scenario were real. Below is a recap of the scenario and the requirements of the Five-year strategy white Paper which was outlined in Assessment 2 Part A. Deliverables The deliverables required of each student are: 1. Determine three options that exist in adjacent markets or with related but different products or technologies; 2. Nominate the preferred option and state why you believe it to be so; and 3. Discuss the implications specifically relating to your part of the business, and what challenges these might represent. Separate the discussion into short-term and long-term issues. Students will be assessed on the overall quality of their White Paper and their ability to comprehensively address all the areas that should be contained in such a document. Please ensure you are familiar with the marking criteria in the attached rubric before you commence planning your submission. Teamwork Log Students should also keep a log of how they have worked together as part of a team in the delivery of this project. This includes meeting dates and times, meeting minutes/notes, a detailed description of how tasks were allocated and completed (and by whom), copies of emails and/or written discussion regarding the project, and any other evidence of teamwork that students would like to include. All students involved in the project need to check the log before submission. It is assumed that the final submission has been agreed between students as being an accurate record of the work that has taken place for the project.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT608 Business Law and International Contexts
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT608 Business Law and International Contexts Assessment Comparative Legal Analysis Oral Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length 5 minute oral presentation (no slides) + Research notes 1500 Words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes a) Critically analyse what law is and the role law plays in doing business internationally b) Critically evaluate the applicability of a significant range of laws and explain their impact on those carrying out professional and managerial duties Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 3.1 (week 5) Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks MGT608_Assessment 1_Comparative Legal Analysis
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT611 International Business Strategy Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT611 International Business Strategy Assessment Emerging Market Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes a) Critically evaluate the key modern economic theories and events in recent global economic history. c) Synthesise recommendations informed by contemporary international business theory. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4) Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 marks Context: This assessment supports students in developing their skills and knowledge in the foundational international business strategy topics that include external environmental assessment, problem diagnosis, strategy development, and the consideration of micro and macro-level factors influencing the strategic decision of entering an emerging market. It is expected to equip students with a wellformed view of international business environment and theories to guide the strategic options available to the firms considering international expansion as their next growth path. Instructions: To Successfully complete Assessment 1 you are required to complete Part one (1) AND Part two (2). Part 1: • Locate a small-to-medium sized firm (SME) in Australia. It has to be an SME that has potential to expand internationally. You need to explain what it is and why you believe the firm can compete internationally. • Conduct secondary research on the chosen SME in order to identify key descriptive information on the entity, such as the industry, industry market structure, firm’s competitive position within this industry in Australia, firm’s target market in Australia and overseas (if it already sells overseas). • In addition, you need to identify what is considered an SME in Australia, how different SMEs are from large firms, and what that means for the SME entering an international market. MGT611_Assessment 1_Emerging Market Analysis Page 1 of 7 Please, check relevant literature/trade publications. That also means you need to research the available academic literature on the differences between the two categories of firms and to briefly attempt to relate the outcomes of this research to the firm entering the foreign location you choose. Part 2: • Locate an emerging market you believe is appropriate for the firm to enter. • It should involve the application of a number of the key relevant theories, concepts, and models applicable to analysing international business environment (which will be analysed in your second assignment) and theories relevant to market entry strategy (entry strategy is part of your second assignment). For example, on the environment you may want discuss the OLI framework (Dunning, 1977) or the Institutional theory (North, 1990). Please, note, these are just a couple of examples and you are strongly advised to go beyond just these two theories. Remember, you should be able to relate the theories to the chosen market. Suggested format: Whilst the format may vary for your analysis, below is suggested format for you to follow: • Background. Brief biographical on the chosen entity, relevant theory, and national market). Suggest 200 words. • Key Descriptive Information. Suggest 1200 words • The firm and its micro environment, including theory (see above). • The macro environment in which the chosen corporate entity has to operate in one selected national market, including theory (see above). • Conclusion. Your conclusion should mirror your opening recapping highlights that lead to a conclusion. Highlight only the key points that summarise your main pieces of information, which might include presenting new, important facts, projections or a justification for the reader. Suggest 100 words • Reference list. List all sources consulted • Appendix (not mandatory, any material that supports points made in the main body) Note: Assignment 2 will focus on developing an international business strategy for your chosen firm (organisation). A separate written Brief is issued for Assessment 2. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Criteria for Assessment Your assessment will be graded according to the criteria set out in the Assessment Rubric below. Please read this carefully. Submission Instructions: MGT611_Assessment 1_Emerging Market Analysis Page 2 of 7 ? Submit the report via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT611 International Business Strategy. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MGT611 International Business Strategy Assessment 3
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT611 International Business Strategy Assessment Simulation Board Room Presentation Individual/Group Group (3 people max) Length 10 minutes Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes c) Synthesise recommendations informed by contemporary international business theory. d) Create and present an international business opportunity pitch in an emerging market context. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.1 (week 11) Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 marks Context: This assessment supports students in developing their skills and knowledge in the foundational international business topics that include environmental assessment, problem diagnosis, and strategy development. It is expected to equip students with a well-formed view of contemporary issues across emerging markets, and the ability to identify key issues governing the strategic options available to small firms entering these markets. Students are also expected to develop competencies in non-traditional, but increasingly important communications techniques such as video and audio presentation. Instructions: Working in your assigned groups, you are required to prepare a group presentation of the major findings based on Assessments two (2). You need to prepare a 10 minute presentation briefly summarising the main findings on the chosen emerging market and entry strategy discussed and analysed. Please note: given the time constraint, only major findings are to be presented. A particular emphasis should be placed on the strategy that the SME can adopt towards corruption or bribery it is to face in the emerging market. You will need to find ways of addressing the audience in a compelling manner, paying attention to audio quality, lighting quality, sincerity of presentation, clarity of your perspective and overall impact. ALL members of the group are required to spend approximately equal time on camera and PowerPoint/Prezi slides are NOT to be used. MGT611_Assessment 3_Simulation Board Room Presentation Page 2 of 6 Simulation Board Room Presentation Content: Your simulated boardroom presentation is to be produced based on your Assessment 2. The presentation should be completed to the professional standard that would be required of a boardroom presentation if the scenario outlined in Assessment 2 were real. In the presentation, your group is required to: ? Introduce yourselves and the presentation topic. State briefly the key issues your presentation will cover ? Introduce the organisation that is being analysed ? Introduce and discuss the selected emerging market and its conditions ? Propose possible strategies addressing the identified threats of corruption and problems associated with country environments ? Display a thorough understanding of the theories/concepts related to international business strategy. Presentation Questions: Presentations should address the following questions, along with any other relevant points: ? What are the major emerging country conditions the SME is facing ? How threats of corruption in the host country are going to be dealt with? ? What entry strategies would you recommend and why? Submission Instructions: Creating your video presentation ? Create a short video presentation, length: 5 minutes o Be specific and clear, as you will be assessed on originality and authenticity ? Tips on filming a video presentation is available at: https://laureateau. blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-3310931-dt-content-rid- 82324_1/institution/Groupwide/Submit%20Video%20Online%20Part%201%20Filming%20v 2.pdf ? Your presentation must be in video format (mp4, MOV, etc.) for uploading into Blackboard (refer to the link below) Uploading your video presentation ? Detailed instructions on compressing (if necessary) and uploading your video presentation is available at: https://laureateau. blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_4044_1&cont ent_id=_387629_1&mode=reset ? Submit the recorded video via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT611 International Business Strategy. ? After uploading your video presentation, retain a copy in a safe place. ? The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. ? Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. MGT611_Assessment 3_Simulation Board Room Presentation Page 3 of 6 Students should use the brief to guide what to include in the assessment and the following rubric to inform the standard required.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment 1
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment Assessment One – Information Systems Critical Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: a) Critically analyse enterprise information systems and requirements in the context of the contemporary business environment Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2 (week 4) Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: The assessment suite in this subject is built on top of skills you are building in your learning activities. Although the learning activities do not carry any assessable weight by themselves, completing them and seeking input from your peers and the learning facilitator is essential for you to achieving a positive result in the subject. Before beginning this assessment, be sure that you have completed the learning activities in the modules one and two. Instructions: Access the Latureae Briefing Document. Latureae is the case study briefing for this assignment. Consider and identify the primary and secondary activities in the Latureae busness model. Identify any sub-activities for each primary and second activity. For each of them, determine which specific sub-activities create value. Then identify links between the value-creating activities and subactivities. Using Porter’s value chain model, present your identified major activities and sub-activities in the Latureae business model. Make recommendations to the Latureae management on how they can enhance or maximise the value offered to ‘customers.’ There is no required format for the assessment. Students should use initiative and be sure to conform to the APA referencing style, making use of external sources as appropriate. Be sure to bookend your assignment with an introduction and conclusion as well as a list of references that make considerable use of the Torrens University library and databases. MIS500-Assign1 Page 2 of 3
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment 2
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment Assessment Two – Solution Plan Individual/Group Individual Length 2000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: b) Synthesise requirements and recommend a number of tested and verifiable solutions to address limitations to contemporary business problems c) Devise and communicate a strategy which embodies the principles of agile methodology, to address complex business needs across an organisation, while meeting objectives and applications of information technology. Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 4.1 (week 7) Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks Context: The assessment suite in this subject is built on top of skills you are building in your learning activities. Although the learning activities do not carry any assessable weight by themselves, completing them and seeking input from your peers and the learning facilitator is essential for you to achieving a positive result in the subject. Before beginning this assessment, be sure that you have completed the learning activities in the modules one, two and three. Instructions: Read the feedback from the learning facilitator on your first assessment carefully. Fix any holes in your analysis and build a cache of external references if you fell short of the referencing requirement. With your (enhanced) first assessment as a starting point, use the identification of activities, sub-activities and linkages between them to formulate a solution plan for Latureae. Using the principles of agile, present a recommended systems blueprint to the Latureae management. If you make recommendations on specific systems, you should refer to external sources on how these have led other firms to significant efficiency improvements in the past. The solution plan should be appropriately justified and illustrate to management what the expected gains of implementing your solution would ideally be. MIS500-Assign2 Page 2 of 3 There is no required format for the assessment. Students should use initiative and be sure to conform to the APA referencing style, making use of external sources as appropriate. Be sure to bookend your assignment with an introduction and conclusion as well as a list of references that make considerable use of the Torrens University library and databases. Submission Instructions: You are expected to begin this assessment when you begin the trimester, especially as you relate the learning activities (formative assessment) to this and the other (summative) assessments. Be sure to keep several drafts of your work as well as your notes and any sources you used to draw on in preparing it. Extensions will be considered only in extenuating circumstances where the student has applied before the due date. At that point, students are required to provide the latest draft, in case the extension is not granted. Students are responsible for keeping appropriate back-ups and drafts of their assignments and to submit the correct version. Torrens University Australia policies apply to the preparation and submission of this assignment.
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment 3
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment Assessment Three – Reflective Portfolio Individual/Group Individual Length 3000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: d) Develop own professional practice and ethical standards around business problems and implementation of solutions Submission By 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.1 (week 11) Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks Context: The assessment suite in this subject is built on top of skills you are building in your learning activities. Although the learning activities do not carry any assessable weight by themselves, completing them and seeking input from your peers and the learning facilitator is essential for you to achieving a positive result in the subject. Before beginning this assessment, be sure that you have completed the learning activities in all of the modules. Instructions: As you begin this subject, start and keep a learning journal that you add to during the process of learning about the foundations of information systems. A suggested format for the learning journal is as follows: Date Learning Activity Impact Evidence (You are free to have another format of your choosing, and if you do, the following comments will need to be adjusted.) MIS500-Assign3 Page 2 of 3 For each day in your learning journey, write the date and then the learning activity you engaged in. Detail what impact the learning had on you and then include any evidence you might like to keep later. This journal should be appended to this assessment when you submit it. To do this assessment well, you will need to engage in reflective analysis. Reflection is what happens when you are quiet and calm and have appropriate time to study and is how you integrate the materials in this subject with what you already know. Sometimes the materials may challenge what you already know, and at other times it may create new knowledge, opinions or ways you will integrate into your professional practice. Reflection is not a cursory comment about a learning activity but instead is an authentic assessment as it involves you being vulnerable, allowing your personal beliefs and the way you perceive the world around you to be challenged and, if necessary, changed by what you learn. An important element of reflection is your incorporation of your belief system, your morals and ethics as well as how you view the impact of information systems on people. Toward the end of the trimester, take your learning journal and then build a narrative that summarises the journey and learnings you undertook while studying this subject. You should refer to specific journal entries and/or extracts from learning activities to demonstrate your learning. You should refer to how you can apply the learnings in your future career or the organisation you currently work for. Should you wish to you can focus your self reflection on one aspect of the subject from the following topics : - Business Intelligence and Big data - Cybersecurity - Agile Methods and system development - CRM technologies - SCM Technologies There is no required format for the assessment. Students should use initiative and be sure to conform to the APA referencing style, making use of external sources as appropriate. Be sure to bookend your assignment with an introduction and conclusion. You may also like to append your learning activities or other artefacts that demonstrate the attainment of your learning or the ways in which the learning materials have affected you personally. Submission Instructions: Do not leave this assessment to the last minute! You are expected to begin this assessment when you begin the trimester, especially as you relate the learning activities (formative assessment) to this and the other (summative) assessments. Be sure to keep several drafts of your work as well as your notes and any sources you used to draw on in preparing it. Although the journal is not part of the word count in this assessment, to get the level of richness required, it is expected that it will be approximately twice the number of words in the assessable component of the assessment. MIS500-Assign3 Page 3 of 3 Be sure to build a narrative as your learning journal on its own will not be read. Extensions will be considered only in extenuating circumstances where the student has applied before the due date. At that point, students are required to provide the latest draft, in case the extension is not granted. Students are responsible for keeping appropriate back-ups and drafts of their assignments and to submit the correct version. Torrens University Australia policies apply to the preparation and submission of this assignment. Learning Rubric: Assessment Three
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
PROJ 6000 Principles of Project Management Assessment 3a
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 3 – Visual Presentation: Project Management Processes, Methodologies and Knowledge Areas Individual/Group Individual Length 6 -10 slides Learning Outcomes Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes: 1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI’s Code of Ethics. 3. Apply appropriate project management tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday End of module 5 Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 Marks Context: Leading organisations across sectors and geographic borders have been steadily embracing project management as a means of controlling spending and improving project results. These, and other desirable outcomes have been achieved through the application of project management methodologies, standards, and maturity models, which has understandably been embraced by many contemporary organisations. Project managers of course are an integral part of delivering successful projects, and as such, have many responsibilities to discharge throughout a project’s lifecycle. PROJ6000
We provide totally customized solution as per need of the students.
PROJ 6000 Principles of Project Management Assessment 4
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ 6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 4 – Personal Reflection Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes: 1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI’s Code of Ethics. 2. Critically compare and contrast project management approaches and their appropriateness for managing a variety of project types. 3. Apply appropriate project management tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management. 4. Critically reflect on the leadership styles necessary to succeed in a range of project management situations, and their personal capacity to succeed in those situations. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday First Half of Module 6 Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: At the beginning of your learning journey on this subject, you were encouraged to reflect on your learning experience and knowledge obtained from the learning modules through discussions and participation. This assessment will provide an opportunity for you to reflect on your learning, document lessons learned, identify global project management practices you hope to adopt in your career. In short, your reflection is a tool for developing knowledge and professionalism in all matters relevant to you as a project manager and leader. PROJ6000_assessment